Analysis of pelvic rotation on the standard hip ventrodorsal extended radiographic view

João Martins; Bruno J. Colaço; António J. Ferreira; Mário M. Ginja

doi:10.3415/VCOT-15-02-0025

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29(01): 68-74
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-15-02-0025

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

Analysis of pelvic rotation on the standard hip ventrodorsal extended radiographic view

João Martins

¹Centre for Research and Technology of Agro-Environment and Biological Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

,

Bruno J. Colaço

¹Centre for Research and Technology of Agro-Environment and Biological Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

²Department of Animal Science, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

,

António J. Ferreira

³Department of Clinics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

,

Mário M. Ginja

¹Centre for Research and Technology of Agro-Environment and Biological Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

⁴Department of Veterinary Science, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Objectives: To study the symmetry of the iliac horizontal diameter (IHD) maximum obturator foramen width (OFW), ischiatic femoral overlap (IFO), pelvic horizontal radius (PHR), femoral head diameter (FHD), and obturator foramen area (OFA) parameters in the normal hip extended radiographic view and to evaluate the correlation of pelvic rotation with the magnitude of asymmetry of these parameters.

Methods: Nine canine cadavers from adult, large and giant breeds were radiographed in standard hip extended views and with 2°, 4° and 6° degrees of rotation. The variables IHD, OFW, IFO, PHR, FHD, and OFA were analysed in radiographs.

Results: The IHD measurements exhibited repeatability, bilateral symmetry and 95% of confidence interval of asymmetry in different pelvic rotations without superposition (p <0.05); OFW and IFO exhibited repeatability, bilateral symmetry and a small superposition in 95% of confidence interval of asymmetry according different pelvic rotations; PHR, FHD and OFA exhibited repeatability, bilateral symmetry and unacceptable superposition in 95% of confidence interval of asymmetry depending on pelvic rotation.

Clinical significance: The IHD is the recommended variable and OFW is an acceptable variable in order to evaluate slight pelvic rotation. The data may be used in qualitative analyses of hip extended radiographic views. In the future, complementary studies should be performed to evaluate the impact of degree of pelvic rotation on the hip dysplasia score.

Keywords

Iliac horizontal diameter - pelvic horizontal radius - femoral head diameter - maximum obturator foramen width - ischiatic overlap - femoral overlap - obturator foramen area

Full Text

References

References
1 Zorko B, Ivanusa T, Pelc R. Progression of hip dysplasia in 40 police working dogs: a retrospective study. Slov Vet Res 2005; 42: 71-76.
2 Ginja MM, Silvestre AM, Gonzalo-Orden JM. et al. Diagnosis, genetic control and preventive management of canine hip dysplasia: a review. Vet J 2010; 184: 269-276.
3 Schnelle GB. Some new diseases in dog. American Kennel Gazette 1935; 52: 25-26.
4 Martins J, Ferreira AJ, Ginja MM. Morphometric assessment of the hip joint in the Estrela mountain dog breed. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 202-210.
5 Ginja MM, Silvestre AM, Colaço J. et al. Hip dysplasia in Estrela mountain dogs: prevalence and genetic trends 1991-2005. Vet J 2009; 182: 275-282.
6 Smith GK, Lawler DF, Biery DN. et al. Chronology of hip dysplasia development in a cohort of 48 Labrador Retrievers followed for life. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 20-33.
7 Vezzoni A. Definition and clinical diagnosis of canine hip dysplasia; early diagnosis and treatment options. Eur J Comp A Pract 2007; 17: 126-132.
8 Todhunter RJ, Mateescu R, Lust G. et al. Quantitative trait loci for hip dysplasia in a cross-breed canine pedigree. Mamm Genome 2005; 16: 720-730.
9 Chalmers HJ, Nykamp SN, Lerer A. The Ontario Veterinary College Hip Certification Program- Assessing inter- and intra- observer repeatability and comparison of findings to those of the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals. Can Vet J 2013; 54: 42-46.
10 Andronescu A, Kelly L, Kearney MT. et al. Associations between early radiographic and computed tomographic measures and canine hip joint osteoarthritis and maturity. Am J Vet Res 2015; 76: 19-27.
11 Verhoeven GEC, Fortrie RR, Duchateau L. et al. The effect of a technical quality assessment of hip- extended radiographs on interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of canine hip Dysplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010; 51: 498-503.
12 Whittington K, Banks WC, Carlson WD. et al. Report of panel on canine hip dysplasia. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1961; 139: 791-806.
13 Riser WH. Producing diagnostic pelvic radiographs for canine hip dysplasia. J Am Vet Assoc 1962; 141: 600-603.
14 Dennis R. Interpretation and use of BVA/KC hip scores in dogs. In Practice 2012; 34: 178-194.
15 Skurková L, Hluchý M, Lacková M. et al. Relation of the Norberg angle and the position of the femoral head centre to the dorsal acetabular edge in the evaluation of canine hip dysplasia. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 433-438.
16 Verhoeven G, Fortrie R, Van Ryssen B. et al. Worldwide screening for canine hip dysplasia: Where are we now?. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 10-19.
17 Genevois JP, Cachon T, Fau D. et al. Canine hip dysplasia radiographic screening. Prevalence of rotation of the pelvis along its length axis in 7,012 conventional hip extended radiographs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 296-298.
18 Thompson R, Roe SC, Robertson ID. Effects of pelvic positioning and simulated dorsal acetabular rim remodeling on the radiographic shape of the dorsal acetabular edge. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007; 48: 8-13.
19 Petrie A, Watson P. Statistic for veterinary and animal science. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1999. pg. 243
20 Ginja MMD, Ferreira AJ, Silvestre AM. et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of distraction indices in PennHIP examinations of the hip joints in dogs. Acta Vet Hung 2006; 54: 387-392.
21 Lee J, Koh D, Ong CN. Statistical evaluations of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Comput Biol Med 1989; 19: 61-70.
22 Verhoeven G, Coopman F, Duchateau L. et al. Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of canine hip dysplasia using the standard ventrodorsal hip extended radiographic method. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48: 387-393.
23 Tannast M, Murphy SB, Langlot Z. et al. Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays- a comparison of six parameters. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35: 149-155.
24 Van der Bom MJ, Goote ME, Vincken KL. et al. Pelvic rotation and tilt cause misinterpretation of the acetabular index measured on radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 1743-1749.
25 Boiocchi S, Vezzoni L, Vezzoni A. et al. Radiographic changes of the pelvis in Labrador and Golden Retrievers after juvenile pubic symphysiodesis: objective and subjective evaluation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 218-225.
26 Bausman JA, Wendelburg KL. Evaluation of the effect of pelvic tilt in the coronal plane on the Norberg angle measured in ventrodorsal radiographic views of a canine hip joint bone model. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71: 1348-1353.
27 Volta A, Piccionello AP, Salvaggio A. et al. Effect of pelvic inclination and torsional deformity on canine acetabular morphology with computed tomography. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 440-444.